6/23 ML analysis Big M and Bal

[NIATROSS]

Multiple posters have made multiple idiotic assinine statements regarding ML's and their makers.
Going home broke and suffereing significant losses among them.
Failing to provide any data to back up any claims

6/23 Big M ML favorites won at 67% clip and brought back over $47 on $24 wagered.
Enough profit to cover Friday's loss and still be up for the week end.

6/23 Bal favs won at aT about 40 % but showed a loss of $3.40 loss on $26 wagered.

Going home broke or suffering sigificant losses ? Doubtful.

[javelina]

Multiple posters have made multiple idiotic assinine statements regarding ML's and their makers.
Going home broke and suffereing significant losses among them.
Failing to provide any data to back up any claims

6/23 Big M ML favorites won at 67% clip and brought back over $47 on $24 wagered.
Enough profit to cover Friday's loss and still be up for the week end.

6/23 Bal favs won at aT about 40 % but showed a loss of $3.40 loss on $26 wagered.

Going home broke or suffering sigificant losses ? Doubtful.

Small samples.   I could do the Vernon Downs as I archive all the programs and results.   From the start of the season to present.

If last nights Big M was that sharp that full credit to my good friend Darrin Zoccali who has been abused on this forum by many.   It is obvious Darrin is an astute student of the game and worlds above the venom that has been bestowed upon him.

Also please stop with the name calling and baiting, we can have a civil discussion about the Morning Line without "Multiple posters have made multiple idiotic assinine statements", ya reckon?

[NIATROSS]

Small samples ? 
They were twice as big as yours yet you made the commets you did after providing a 1 day sample.

I called no one a name.I was NOTt the one who said the work of a ML maker was to used for anything but utter laughter.
I voiced my opinions on statements made on a public forum I found to be idiotic and assinine.
I then went on to refute those posts.

My opinions were then vaildated by my data and by a certain idividual refusing to prove he could do any better.

[javelina]

Small samples ? 
They were twice as big as yours yet you made the commets you did after providing a 1 day sample.

I called no one a name.I was NOTt the one who said the work of a ML maker was to used for anything but utter laughter.
I voiced my opinions on statements made on a public forum I found to be idiotic and assinine.
I then went on to refute those posts.

My opinions were then vaildated by my data and by a certain idividual refusing to prove he could do any better.

25 is twice as much as 36.
It is almost like you say things just to initiate some type of battle.
I give up what do you want me to say???  "If the ML favorite does not win, it means he did not get his juice, the trainer is therefore a cheating chemist and should be tarred and feather in the town square."

There...I hope that is what you were looking for.