In The Sulky Forum
General Category => General Harness Racing Discussion => Topic started by: cashman on April 30, 2013, 08:49:00 AM
-
Why is the Simpson stake a non betting race? They got 6 entries. Don't think I've ever seen this at the Big M.
-
I think there is common ownership with the Holloway horses ,which create only 5 betting interests thus no wagering.
-
That's bs.
-
I think there is common ownership with the Holloway horses ,which create only 5 betting interests thus no wagering.
They ran the second division of the Aquarius with only 5 horses entered and it wasn't a non wagering race.
-
They ran the second division of the Aquarius with only 5 horses entered and it wasn't a non wagering race.
Just surprised its non wagering. You really think they were afraid of a minus pool with somewhereovertherainbow?
-
Just surprised its non wagering. You really think they were afraid of a minus pool with somewhereovertherainbow?
Actually that was my original thinking but saw the Gerwetz entry and thought otherwise. The exacta of SWOAR and Bestbestingin would have killed them..
-
Well we Montrell can't gomwith the big boys. A very even 3rd. Lots of hype for this horse. Need a real driver though.
-
Andy Get's the best out of her. If they plan on montrell driving all year, they must hate money.....
-
That exacta sure would have killed them....
-
I think a little indecisiveness from Montrell coupled with maybe the filly isn't super horse after all...
-
Just surprised its non wagering. You really think they were afraid of a minus pool with somewhereovertherainbow?
the way i understand it was because the gerwhert(?) guy owned a piece of 4 of them
-
just 2 of them.... slaphead
-
just 2 of them.... slaphead
they said 4 on the live feed
-
just looked at the program ..yup Gerwitz has 3, I own one with partners and the 2 are separate ownership